Archive for October, 2010

Procrastination Station #80

Friday, October 15th, 2010

You know the drill: some stuff I have found on the internet, and thought you might like.

Rob Mackenzie asks which poets you’d have on your poetry reading dream team, over at Magma

Great stuff from the Guardian this week: the book is dead, long live the book // What’s the point of literary prizes? // A poem from Famous Seamus // & rockstars pick their favourite poets

Also guys, if you’re London-based, please please please go to this!

Kona Macphee on guerilla poetry (like this? Check out my poetry ninja post of a few months back)

“I occasionally refer to The Birthday Letters as You Guys, What About MY Feelings: The Point-Missing Chronicles“: Tiger Beatdown on Ted Hughes

Has ‘the humanities crisis’ now arrived?

Poetry on TV (thanks to Leandro for the tip-off on this one)

Can I have a cover like this for my book, please?

ONS fans and friends — what they’re up to this week: Gareth Trew is at a handful of stones // Regina Green at Come Out, Kicked Out! // Ms Hannah Radenkova turns her hand beautifully to book covers // Brilliant poems by Suzannah Evans at PoetCasting // What Russell Jones did on National Poetry Day // William Soule is fscking brilliant

Yes please.

Saw this and thought of Peg.

“Don’t consult Dr Google. Dr Google got his qualification on the internet.” Wise words from Natalie Perkins.

Neon poems?! AWESOME.

Why do I never come across marginalia like this?


I’m kind of over bitter break up poems at the moment, but I did like this one.


One of my all-time favourite songs by one of my all-time favourite songwriters.


Can’t believe I’ve never posted this before. ♥ these boys.

Have a great weekend… I’m off to FREAKIN’ PARIS with a gorgeous man in tow! Recommend me some good bookstores/literary delights!

(Photo by Cosi!)

Subscribe to ONS! Add to Technorati Favorites

Things I’m Reading Thursday #22

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

What I’m reading this week…

Cosmopolis by Don DeLillo
Confession (why does TiRT so often begin with me confessing to something shameful?): until last week, I’d never read any Don DeLillo. I know — it’s like Elliott Smith all over again. People have been saying to me for years “check this guy out, you’ll like him, promise”, and I’ve been nodding and then ignoring them, and as it turns out, that was a very silly mistake.
What I needed of course was for a gorgeous man upon whom I had a massive crush to casually suggest in passing that I should maybe read some DeLillo, by the way. Obviously that’s the only catalyst guaranteed to get me running for the nearest bookstore (I know, I have no shame). As it happened, the nearest bookstore was the utterly fabulous Word Power, and Cosmopolis was the only DeLillo novel they had in stock. So I bought it.

That was at about 1pm-ish. The rest of that day was spent inside the novel. The last book I read in one sitting was probably Russell Hoban’s Kleinzeit (recommended if you like DeLillo, by the way), which was a good few years ago now — I’d forgotten quite what a weird feeling it is to look up from finishing a novel and find you’ve lost an entire day of your life.

But weird in a good way — I absolutely loved Cosmopolis. In short, it follows one very eventful 24-hour period in the life (mostly in the limo) of billionnaire asset manager Eric Packer. You follow his every move — you eat breakfast with him, you watch him interact with his entourage of larger-than-life staff — you even get a rather squeamish ringside seat for his daily medical checkup. Stupidly melodramatic and unrealistic things happen one after the other after the other… and yet at the same time, absolutely nothing happens for pages and pages and pages.

I was quite surprised to find that the general feeling among reviewers was (as Wikipedia diplomatically puts it) “mixed to negative”, though on reflection, and having now read some of these reviews, I can take their point. A lot of people have drawn comparisons between Eric Packer and Patrick Bateman, generally coming to the conclusion that Easton Ellis does rich young psychopaths a lot better. Personally, I think it’s an unfair comparison — and one that’s far too obvious. Unlike Bateman (who, like Nabakov’s Humbert Humbert, you find yourself wanting to like in spite of your own better judgement), Packer is almost entirely without personality — you can’t warm to him, you can’t really warm to the people around him either, you’re never invested in the action because you can’t care what happens to Packer. And neither can he — but that’s what kept me gripped. What the hell happened to this person?, I wanted to know. Does money do this to a human being, or is there something deeper? Surely there’s something at the end of this rainbow of overwhelming apathy? I wanted a reason to like or dislike Packer, a reason to root for him, or to wish him dead. DeLillo kept me scrabbling around for that through the entirety of the novel, and the entirety of my afternoon. And of course, I never got it. So hey, I can see why people hated this book — but I always kind of like it when a writer gets one over on me. I thought it was damn brilliant, and can’t wait to read more. Recommendations, anyone? Which DeLillo should I read next?

What are you reading this week?

(Photo by TakenPictures)

Subscribe to ONS! Add to Technorati Favorites

Poetry & “cronyism”

Monday, October 11th, 2010

The other day, I went for a cup of coffee with a friend who edits a reasonably well-known literary journal. I was asking about his plans for the latest issue, who he was hoping to receive submissions from, and generally how it was all going. He listed the names of a few poets whose work he was hoping to publish — all in all, it sounded like a fantastic mix. “But of course, I can’t have all of them,” he said. “It’d look like cronyism if I did.”

The issue of cronyism and nepotism in the poetry world is one which has long fascinated me. I watched with interest, for example, as the Foetry.com vs Jorie Graham incident unfolded, and more recently became more than a little embroiled in a, er, lively comment thread on “chum marketing”, here at the Magma Poetry blog. In the early days of Read This Magazine I was always very worried about being accused on cronyism, as I sometimes published the work of people I knew in person, and when I judged the Sentinel Literary Quarterly poetry contest earlier this year I was not without trepidation as I waited to find out who the winners might be. Accusations of cronyism are bandied about freely wherever there are editors, contest judges and rejected writers — the Guardian even goes as far as this:

That’s how “schools” of poetry get started - cronyism. The poetry contestants want a level playing field? Try football.

So cronyism exists. It’s all over the poetry world like a rash, in fact. I’ll still rage away happily about editors who only publish or review work by their own current/former creative writing students, for example; I’m still suspicious of literary journals who invite the same poets back for publication time after time after time. I stand by my previous rants about poets swinging contests and other opportunities in their favour by engaging in large-scale covert Facebook PR campaigns and such. But after meeting my fellow editor friend I got to really wondering about the issue. Here is an editor who just wants to put together the best publication he can, but who feels restricted by how it might come across. I started to wonder if maybe I’d been too ready to jump to conclusions about journal acceptances, anthology selections and contest winners in the past. I’m now thinking that there might well be a lot of totally innocent stuff going on in the poetry world — totally innocent and worthwhile stuff — that suffers from being undeservingly tarred by the cronyism brush.

After speaking to my friend, I started thinking about the speculative list he’d put together for the new issue of his magazine. He’s relatively new to the publication and still getting to know how things work, so he doesn’t want to take too many risks with the stuff he puts out there for now — therefore, a lot of the poets he wanted to approach for submissions are guaranteed, tried-and-tested kind of people. And yes, many of them he knows personally — but if you’re looking for a guarantee that their stuff is going to be good, and for some degree of control or opportunity for discussion, that’s not altogether unreasonable, is it? He was also worried that too many of the poets he had his eye on were from the same part of the world as him, and/or writing in a similar style to his own work. On the surface, this could definitely be seen as favouritism or even self promotion, but it does make some sense. As an editor, you’re always swayed to an extent by personal taste — particularly when you’re soliciting submissions from individual poets rather than receiving work by open submission. And it makes perfect sense if you’re drawn to work by other poets like yourself — chances are you were heavily influenced by other poets from your area (although, perhaps not?), and you’re obviously bound to be attracted to other work like your own. Chances are, if we all went away and drew up the contents page for the dream first issue of our own fantasy literary journal, we’d probably find a lot of friends, close influences and fellow countrymen included.

Finally, I began to wonder — what is so wrong with promoting the work of your friends and colleagues, if it’s deserving of merit? I constantly sing the praises of brilliant upcoming young American poet Heather Bell, for example. Not because she is a personal friend or because she and I have been sharing and critiquing each other’s writing for years, but because she is absolutely bloody brilliant, and her work deserves to be widely recognised. I’m passionate about raising the profile of Scotland’s apparently invisible younger generation of poets, so I’ll regularly drop names like Chris Lindores, Jenny Lindsay, Charlotte Runcie or Bram Gieben into conversations, blogposts and the like. Yes, these people are friends and acquaintances of mine, too — but we’re all writing from the same city, all roughly the same age and all at similar stages in our writing careers, so surely that’s just to be expected? Does any praise of a poet mean nothing if it comes from someone who knows them well? If so, we’re in trouble, because (particularly here in the UK) the poetry world is a bit like St Mary Mead — everyone knows everyone.

Thoughts? Get thee to the comments box!

(Photo by m.jesenska)

Subscribe to ONS! Add to Technorati Favorites

What I’ve learned about poetry readings.

Monday, October 4th, 2010

I’ve written a lot about reading your work in public here in the two years (I missed my own second blog-birthday around the middle of August) since ONS began, but I have a confession to make: with some of the earlier posts, I didn’t have a huge amount of first hand experience. If I’m honest, I was going mainly off what I’d seen other poets do (this just as often teaches you how not to approach reading in public, by the way), and drawing from only a small handful of readings I’d been invited to give.

I don’t know how many of you will bother to go skulking off into the archives to see what I said — probably no one. But fortunately, it’s all reasonably sensible advice, lack of experience notwithstanding. However, these days I feel like a proper seasoned performer — someone should have said to me back in 2008, hey, when you’ve done two Edinburgh Festivals, two London Poetry Festivals and the Edinburgh International Book Festival, then you can come and advise young poets about reading, OK?

So OK, here I am. I’ve actually come to write this post because I came across this one over at White Hot Truth (new favourite blog, in case you hadn’t noticed). I decided it was time to update my thoughts on reading, tell you what I’ve learned, and hear what you guys do when faced with the prospect of getting off the page and onto the stage. So here goes.

Danielle’s first point is “gratitude is always the best place to begin.” I’m shocked to find that I never mentioned this in any previous posts. YES OBVIOUSLY. Always, always begin your set by saying thank you. Thank the organiser for inviting you. Thank the person who tipped you off about the open mic. Thank your fellow readers, if you think they deserve it, for sharing the stage with you. Whatever. Above all, thank the audience. These people have actively made the effort to come and support poetry, for goodness sakes. They might actually have paid. They might even have fought their way through horrible weather, across the city, across the country, to come and see you. Say thank you.

Be prepared, says Danielle, and I agree. First of all, have a damn set list already. I think it’s considered cool at the moment to rock up at a reading without (or apparently without) any idea of what you’re going to do when you get to the mic… but honestly? I hate that. There’s nothing more annoying than a poet with a massive stack of A4 paper, rustling around going ‘oh, what should I read next?’ while the audience twiddles their thumbs (the same applies to leafing back and forth through your dog-eared first collection, though admittedly it’s less noisy and you’re less likely to drop paper all over the front row). I’m also wary of poets who read from memory, but spend a couple of minutes between each poem looking skyward as if seeking divine inspiration. If the poems are all there in your head (I wish I had your fabulous memory, folks), then surely there’s also space for a vague set-list to form? And if you’re one of those paper-shufflers… get organised. You have lots of poems, we get it. We’ll take five or six good ones, please, and skip the suspense.

Secondly, do a run-through. This I have said before… but before I always advocated this as a helping hand for you, the poet. Now I say: run through beforehand for the sake of the audience. Remember, they might have actually paid money to see you rock the mic. If you were in a play showing to a ticket-paying crowd would you skip the dress rehearsal? Yes, doing a run through means reading poems to imaginary people in your bedroom and makes you feel like a bit of an idiot, but it’s all good practice. It is a truth universally acknowledged that the more you read your poems aloud, the better your poems get, after all.

A lot of people say you should open your set with your best poem, but I’d dispute this. I think I agree more with Rob Gordon, who says “you’ve got to kick it off with a killer, to grab attention, but then you’ve got to take it up a notch. But you don’t want to blow your wad, so then you’ve got to cool it off a notch. There are a lot of rules.” Sure, he’s talking about making a mixtape (Rob’s rules utterly work, by the way. And I make a lot of mixtapes), but this makes sense. Don’t start and end with brilliant poems but read average stuff in between. Mix it up and keep people listening (audiences aren’t that understanding — they will drift off if you don’t keep them in line). My only rule would be: end on a killer. And I don’t just mean a strong last poem, but a strong last line. I firmly believe that it’s the last two — maybe four — lines you read that really make or break what the crowd think of you. My favourite poem to finish a set on ends “if you don’t want to be a in a poem / don’t fuck a poet.” People always come and recite that back to me afterwards.

Also on the topic of finishing your set: finish your poem and then get the hell out of there. Don’t be one of these twits who stands on the stage til all the applause has died down, for example (a student of mine did this at a reading not too long ago. Awkward). Also, do your thanks, plugging of books and preamble etc at the beginning of your set. Deliver your killer last line(s), then leave. Leave people thinking about your poems, not your “oh hey, and by the way, thanks for having me!” awkwardness.

Lastly: a lot of people ask me about dealing with getting heckled. This is not something I’ve ever written about here before, but it is something I seem to be experiencing with increasing regularity. Some poets get heckled a lot, others have never experienced it. I think you’re only so heckle-able — chances are it’s more to do with your venue and how late into the evening it is (particularly if you’re reading at an event where drink is flowing freely). However, I’ve discovered that being a six foot redhead who dresses like a scruffy hippie and reads poems about BOYS doesn’t always make for a, er, particularly respectful crowd. My personal approach to hecklers — and a lot of people would disagree, I’m sure — is to kick their asses. Usually. Sometimes you’ll get a heckler who wants to offer something useful or genuinely cool and funny — I once got heckled in Klingon while reading my now-old-favourite Star Trek poem, and that was so awesome that I now routinely invite closet Klingon speakers to interject if they feel the need. But often hecklers are just idiots who are too many red wines past their bedtime. Those guys — the “oi darlin’!” brigade, as I like to call them — need and deserve to feel your wrath. I mean, they’re not just disturbing your set, they’re disturbing everyone else’s enjoyment (hopefully) of it as well. Maybe it’s just the teacher in me, I don’t know. But “quit heckling and have the balls to come up and talk to me afterwards, please” usually works pretty well. But I must admit that my all-time favourite response to a heckler came from legendary Edinburgh performance poet Bram Gieben, aka Texture of the Chemical Poets. After politely ducking a few comments from one particularly persistent drunken commentator, he resorted to “hey man, how about you shut the fuck up and get the fuck out of my gig?” That line got the biggest round of applause of the night.

OK guys, what are your golden poetry reading rules? I’d love to hear your take on hecklers, too… you know where the comments box is.

(Photo by Kmeron)

Subscribe to ONS! Add to Technorati Favorites

Procrastination Station #79

Friday, October 1st, 2010
Stuff I like from the web this week, to totally mess up your Friday plans. I’m so kind.

I love White Hot Truth and if that makes me a bit new age-y and daft, so be it. Check out your permission slip from the Universe, Got boundaries? Got class?, and the initiated woman.

Yet more Ginsberg/Howl/James Franco fangirling: Franco selects his favourite poems (thanks, Peg!)

And from one Ginsberg to another… Scott Ginsberg also rocks my socks off.

Don’t be afraid of poetry!

Editors do not hate you, but they have every reason to.

I really enjoyed this poem, posted by Swiss.

You are what you read.

I loved this interview with Billy Collins.

Poetry competition: “improving the human”, open til 7th October.

Four walls: a psychiatrist’s view of poetry and poets

ONS readers’, fans’ and friends’ whereabouts this week: Jim Murdoch at Salamander Cove // The Forest are calling for submissions! // did you guys know my sister has a blog? // a cool senryu from William Soule // Gemma White now has an Etsy! And you can buy Velveteen Zine there!

I was really sad to hear that the great Tony Curtis has died.

Thanks to Caitlin for sending this my way, it made me smile!

Geektastic.

And speaking of geektastic… I’m sorry, is that A DALEK DRESS?!

I heart Shakesville.

Snicker.

Loved this film of the Rolling Stones, listening to a cut of Wild Horses for the first time…

I know I’m late to this (brilliant) party, but I just discovered Meursault.

OhmygodiloveGeoffTrenchard

Have a great weekend, all!

(Photo by Ben Bennitt)

Subscribe to ONS! Add to Technorati Favorites